🔗 Share this article

Australia's decisive move to restrict social platforms access for young people below 16 is creating waves around the globe. Officials, safety advocates, and families are observing intently to see if this strategy will become a template for countries abroad.

Across Europe Movement

Across Europe, a growing chorus of states are exploring parallel measures.

• Denmark plans a ban on social media for youth below 15, with the prime minister declaring that phones and networks are "stealing our kids' childhood". The policy could be passed next year.
• Norway is planning to enforce a age restriction of 15, highlighting the need to protect young people from the "power of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is developing a digital wallet to confirm the user details of social media account holders. Authorities have stated that an similar ban is "an tools on the table".
• In Spain, the prime minister has urged lawmakers to enact a law raising the minimum age for using social media to 16.
• In France, the president has threatened a ban for under-15s, and a government panel has endorsed a related action, including an overnight "internet blackout" for older teenagers.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged parents to block their youngsters from social media up to the age of 15.

For the broader EU, the bloc's legislature has approved a symbolic motion calling for a ban for minors without guardian approval is provided. While it warns of the "habit-forming" quality of these services, the step does not establish binding law.

"A clear age barrier is a useful foundation," stated the European lawmaker behind the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Eye

Across Britain, the administration has not ruled out a potential ban, emphasizing that "nothing is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "grounded in conclusive research".

Last year, momentum built behind a bill to enact restrictions on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Nonetheless, the government pledged to conduct more studies the issue.

Charities have raised warnings. A prominent charity set up by the relatives of a young person who died after encountering disturbing platform posts suggests that a blanket age ban may not make platforms safer and could lead to a "cliff edge" of harm when young people become eligible.

"Australia's ban is a response to the inability of the social media companies to create tools that are appropriate and age appropriate for minors," commented a leading child protection advocate.

The US: A Decentralized Approach

In the United States, legislation is mostly unfolding at the local government level amid federal inaction.

• Utah mandates guardian permission for those under 18 to use social media and limits late-night use.
• The state of Florida has passed a measure barring those below 14 from joining social media, though it faces court battles.
• The state of Virginia has approved a law capping teenagers to one hour of social media access per day, with extra access requiring a guardian's okay.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have likewise passed laws requiring parental consent for minors to open social media presences.

Even with cross-party agreement and calls from certain individuals to copy Australia's lead, a nationwide ban is presently seen as improbable.

Global Perspectives

Beyond these regions, additional countries are likewise considering moves.

• Malaysia aims to restrict social media for teenagers starting from next year.
• Brazil has lifted the minimum age for Instagram to 16.

But, world agencies take a more cautious position. A major UN agency has advised that social media bans carry risks and "may even prove counterproductive". The organization points out that the internet can be a "vital connection" for vulnerable youth and that regulation should not be a "excuse" for social media firms to invest in child safeguards.

As this worldwide discussion unfolds, the policies of the Australian government and its followers demonstrate that policymakers around the world are increasingly willing to stand by for platforms to act voluntarily.